What is the future of software development

What is the future of software development

In 2019, IT spending was $ 3.7 trillion. Market revenue was expected to be $ 560 billion, and the rapid expansion of the software will continue in the coming years.

Strong players in the software and hardware market continue to improve and update their products to make them more productive and more efficient.

Hiring developers is harder now because there are not enough developers and the workload is increasing. Finding the best technical staff has become more difficult and costly. This is why many entrepreneurs are thinking about siled microteams.

What is a micro-development team? How can you use it to move your company forward?

As the name suggests, a microteam is a small group of two to four people, although some teams can expand to ten developers, this is not common.

But there is no need to be delusional, as these teams are a diligently efficient elite who always fulfill agreements on time and with excellent quality.

What is the appeal of micro-teams?

1. Developer landscape.

Hiring developers regionally is one of the biggest challenges in the technology world today. The truth is, there aren't enough developers. And filling vacancies with quality people is much more difficult. Unless your brand, reputation, and pay are exceptional, you will have to fight dozens of other companies to get the same high-quality employees.

Therefore, most organizations are exploring the possibility of working with multiple micro-teams. But don't get this wrong, they still have development teams.

The advantage of microinstructions is that you can purchase them at a discounted price. In addition, they are less risky due to their relatively low turnover rate.

2. Increased productivity.

Although the term "microinstruments" is still in its infancy, it derives from the general concept of lean software development known as microservices.

Essentially, a microservices architecture improves efficiency by dividing the milestones of a development project into independent modules. This allows the incremental addition of important functionality without restructuring or completely replacing the original monolithic structure.

Some of the distinguishing features include the following:

  • Microservices are independent, testable, managed and deployed. And because of the weak adhesion, they are easier and cheaper to maintain.
  • The program is divided into many independent modules interacting through a well-defined interface and lightweight APIs.
  • Separate features enable companies to structure complex designs according to specific business requirements.
  • Microservices provide seamless integration of new features as its technology stack grows and evolves.

For example, Amazon was one of the first organizations to use microservices to transform the entire organization. Previously, all of its services and components are inextricably linked. Therefore, any significant code changes were delayed during the deployment process for weeks before users could access them.

Amazon then split the structures into a single application using microservices. This simplified and compressed the system, allowing developers to identify bottlenecks. This helped them rebuild their applications as service-oriented architectures, with a small team running each service. Microinstructions use the same format!

Let's say you have an old legacy platform that needs to be updated. You can ask your internal team to completely rebuild the central monolithic structure. While this will solve your problem, it will come at a cost. It will also take time and may affect the usability of your product for a short time. It is also possible to hire a micro-team from outside sources.

On the other hand, they will create exceptionally new functions with modern and highly efficient technologies. They will then use the API to connect it to the main monolith.

Flexibility and attraction.

The traditional large command organization is made up of individual teams, each with its own specific area. For example, there might be a front-end team, a back-end team, a DevOps team, etc. These teams can be forced to think long and hard before building software, often wasting time and resources.

On the other hand, a microteam typically consists of full stack developers who are well versed in the entire development process from start to finish. They are also passionate about working on the database, frontend and backend, as well as developing CI / CD methodologies and DevOps responsibilities.

They understand what they are building and why they are building it. They take full ownership and responsibility for the process. As a result, they hardly need any outside management or do not need at all.

The hierarchy, naturally, is flat within the team, that is, there is no lead in it. They jointly assign projects to those most confident in their ability to complete them.

When all is said and done, some contributors are working on 60% backend and 20% DevOps. The rest can be split 50/50 between frontend and backend. Also, if they believe it is beneficial to the project, they can change completely within a few months.

In addition, they can be changed according to the requirements of the project. They also understand how the tasks they perform affect the software development process as a whole and take responsibility for it. The latter results in a higher quality of work done on schedule.

Instead of a conclusion.

Gone are the days when software development was tied to company headquarters. A new trend of microinstructions and microservices is opening up. Microteams can take the burden of software development off your core team, allowing them to focus on other important things. They are also relatively cheap, flexible and knowledgeable. Therefore, they are the best options for companies looking to expand or create other business verticals.